Skip to main content

Hobbit Theology



I’d like to discuss a short, pipe smoking, hairy-toed fellow.   This lovable creature eats two breakfasts a day and was chosen, almost against his will, for a supernatural adventure.  But in addition to writing about myself, I’d also like to comment on ‘The Hobbit’ by JRR Tolkien.

(Did I mention my invisible making ring?*)

Bilbo Baggins is a product of his socially conservative, provincial, comfort loving, halfling culture.   
Into this hobbit’s predictable world comes an outsider who calls him into another with a different set of values centred around a different raison d’etre.  Gandalf the Grey calls the Hobbit (unwillingly at first) to leave his safe world behind and to follow him.  Bilbo, with an almost supernatural push of the will, finally says yes and finds himself surrounded by dwarves... a group of fellow travelers he would never have picked himself.  Throughout the many trials of the trip he finds himself becoming a new man.  He has a different set of values and those strange people he was placed with become like family to him.  

I too am a product of my culture.  We like to think of ourselves as being original and self-made (a cultural value in itself), but somehow deep down I know that if were born in 9th century Mongolia ... I’d be different. Jesus Christ came as an outsider into my world at age 12.  Like Bilbo I have found my values, character, friends and purpose changed to become more like the one who has called me.  This is Christ’s call to all of us; hairy-toed or otherwise.  Jesus says, “Come follow me and I will make you fishers of men”. (Mark 1.17) We are to leave this world behind and join him as citizens of another world living for another purpose.  Will you obey the call and be transformed?

*Okay, it doesn't technically make me invisible, but it does look a lot like the ring in the movie.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Jezebel: Our Whorable Queen

[Extract from the bookElijah Men Eat Meat]

Ahab married Jezebel, then he proceeded to worship Baal.’ -1Kg 16
Queen Jezebel is a Baal-snogging, fake-teaching, boob-flaunting, pride-marching, man-manipulating, Yahweh-blaspheming, prophets’ blood-drinking monstrosity of a female.
And that’s being nice.
This daughter of Ethbaal, the Phoenician King, grows up surrounded by power, education, luxury, and evil. Of course, she doesn’t think of it as evil. No one sees their culture’s sins for what they are. It is like air to a child or water to a fish: it’s so much a part of us that we don’t even know it is there. She thinks her culture is the rule by which others should be measured. Yes, Israel is used to being surrounded by pagan neighbours and their debauched royalty. But now we have a problem. The problem is that this ghoulish gal now has a throne in the midst of God’s holy nation. It’s one thing for a boat to be in the sea. It’s quite another thing for the sea to be in the boat. And the nati…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …