Skip to main content

Is the Bible’s Teaching on Homosexuality "Unenlightened"?

And God loves all his children, 
is somehow forgotten
But we paraphrase a book 
written thirty-five-hundred year ago”
-Macklemore, Same Love

“They exchanged the truth about 
God for a lie
and worshipped and served the creature
rather than the Creator,
who is blessed for ever! Amen.”
-Romans 1.25

There are a lot of rumours about the Bible’s teaching on homosexual practice.  One of these rumours purports that the Bible has been mistranslated or misunderstood on the subject and that homosexual practice is actually endorsed by Scripture. A simple reading of the texts will show that the type of intellectual gymnastics needed to arrive at this conclusion are akin to those which would suggest that we’ve all misunderstood Martin Luther King Jr. who was actually a neo-Nazi with a message was about exterminating left-handed Italians. 

Another idea is that while the Bible may call homosexual practice “sin” [it also refers to many common heterosexual acts like fornication and adultery as “sin”], it does so from the perspective of a culture which didn’t understand homosexuality. “The Bible,” they say (with a remarkable sense of expertise), “was written in an unenlightened time when people weren’t free to experiment with sexual practices and therefore it cannot be expected to reflect our advanced knowledge of such matters.”  Those who support things like gay marriage are therefore labelled as being “progressive” and those who oppose are “conservative” or “old fashioned”.

This sort of reasoning reflects just how little ancient history we’ve actually been taught. The Old Testament condemnations were not written in a time when everyone was heterosexual or even monotheistic. When Moses forbade SSP in ancient Israel it was very much the norm in the surrounding nations; much more so than now.  In addition when the Apostles wrote the New Testament homosex was also practiced among many of the cultural avant-guard of his day. Nero, the Roman Emperor, was in a homo-poly-amorous marriage with two men: Pythagoras (with whom he acted as wife) and Sporus (who was castrated and with whom he acted as husband). The real division is not Unenlightened v. Enlightened. The real division is Christian v. Pagan.  

The good news we proclaim to the world is not about spinning faux arguments for excusing or justifying our sexual sin be it heterosexual or homosexual in nature.  It’s about being forgiven, cleansed and healed. This is something we all need whatever our sexual orientation or history may be.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …