Skip to main content

How Often should we have Sex when we get Married?

   
“There is a flame 
that flickers and sways
But burns while we’re apart”
-Gomez
Tear Your Love Apart



The goal in marriage should always be a sex life in which each spouse is satisfied by both the quality and quantity of sex.  In fallen world there may be occasional obstacles to this (trauma, sickness, conflict, etc) but this is the goal.

Sex is an opportunity to both enjoy and to serve the other in a way that is powerful and unique to marriage. If you desire to have sex three times during any given period of time, but your spouse desires to have sex five times during that same period of time, then you have the opportunity to enjoy sex three times and lovingly serve the other two times.

To withhold physical affection from the other in marriage (be it sexual intercourse or a back rub)is selfish. According to Scripture withholding sex and not seeking to satisfy the other is sin (1 Corinthians 7.5). Our bodies are NOT our own in marriage. They belong to one another. This affects not only the frequency of sex but the way in which it is enjoyed. They may do nothing for you, but if your wife wants a back rub, get to it!
                                       

Sex is to be given and enjoyed. You both need to talk about this issue openly and graciously with one another as very often the frustrated spouse tend to suffer in silence.  When there are deep issues of pain involved there may be need to get outside (pastoral counsellor, therapist, etc.)

Comments

  1. So my question is this: before modern and reliable contraception was the idea of "frequent sex" different to ours?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Jezebel: Our Whorable Queen

[Extract from the bookElijah Men Eat Meat]

Ahab married Jezebel, then he proceeded to worship Baal.’ -1Kg 16
Queen Jezebel is a Baal-snogging, fake-teaching, boob-flaunting, pride-marching, man-manipulating, Yahweh-blaspheming, prophets’ blood-drinking monstrosity of a female.
And that’s being nice.
This daughter of Ethbaal, the Phoenician King, grows up surrounded by power, education, luxury, and evil. Of course, she doesn’t think of it as evil. No one sees their culture’s sins for what they are. It is like air to a child or water to a fish: it’s so much a part of us that we don’t even know it is there. She thinks her culture is the rule by which others should be measured. Yes, Israel is used to being surrounded by pagan neighbours and their debauched royalty. But now we have a problem. The problem is that this ghoulish gal now has a throne in the midst of God’s holy nation. It’s one thing for a boat to be in the sea. It’s quite another thing for the sea to be in the boat. And the nati…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …