Skip to main content

Lucy: A Theological Film Critique


My wife and I went out to the cinema the other night.  As opposed to the chocolate bar rom-coms which some ladies force their men to endure, my wife usually has good taste in films.  She suggested we see “Lucy” an intelligent action-thriller starring Scarlett Johansson.   (My wife is cool like that.)

The acting was fantastic on the part of Johansson who performs a captivatingly realistic panic scene in the first few minutes.  The stunts were well done and the special effects were fresh.  One left feeling they had seen something new.

Theologically a lot could be unpacked.  The theme is the increased human capacity to interact with space and time by cultivating cerebral capacity.  As Johansson’s mind becomes more fully awake she becomes more powerful.  As a Christian this stirs our imagination to consider what it will be like when “Christ changes our humble bodies to be like his glorious body” (Philippians 3).  What will life be like after the Resurrection of the dead?  What will our minds and bodies be able to do that they cannot now do?  Does our human obsession with superheroes and mythological gods reflect the fact that our current mode of existence is not what we are ultimately meant for?

Though I was intrigued by Lucy’s (Johansson’s) interaction with space and time, there were other elements which I felt were more Buddhist Zen than Christian Glorification.   As she was growing in power and abilities, she was losing a part of her humanity.  She no longer experienced desire, fear or love.  There was something slightly robotic about her and she seemed to be losing emotional capacity.  By contrast in Christian understanding we will one day live in glory with Jesus where our laughs will be richer our love deeper and wider and our emotions will be more alive and healthier than ever before.  In short, we will be more human, not less.

Perhaps the main theme of the movie is that our purpose in life is to pass on information for those who follow after.  According to the film this is life’s purpose be it of a single cell or a human genius.  As Christians we would see the passing on of key information (discipleship) as part of our “mission” more than our ultimate purpose.  During our lives we are called to tell our generation as well as the coming generation who God is and what he's up to.   Our ultimate "purpose" for all eternity is glorify God by enjoying him forever. 

A result of this divergent view of humanity’s purpose is a different view of our ultimate problem.  In the film humanity’s problem is ignorance: we simply need more information and we’ll be okay.  According to the gospel our problem is ultimately sin.  More information can be helpful, but it can also make us more efficient at doing evil.  We need more than knowledge, we need salvation: deliverance from sin through being born again into a new life.  That’s why Jesus isn’t just our teacher.  He is our saviour.  He did more than tell good stories, he died in our place, for our sins and rose again to bring us to life.


Good film, 4 stars.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …