Skip to main content

"Help. We Slept Together..."

I am sometimes asked by Christian dating couples who have had sex, what they should now do.  It may seem a weird question to many.  ‘If we are consenting adults’ people ask, ‘why should there be any restrictions placed on sexual expression? If we love each other, why should we have to go through the formality of marriage to express to the other person how we feel?’

For those outside of the faith, the Christian sexual ethic usually comes across as weird at best and repressive at worst. The idea that sex is for just one man and one woman within a one lifetime commitment of marriage does seem to go against every modern, Western ideal which exalts the individual and their rights to do as they see fit with their bodies. 

There are many ways to deviate from the Biblical blueprint of sex. One of the most common is through ‘formication’. That may be a new ‘F’ word for some of you.

Fornication is an old school term for an unmarried man and woman having sex together. It’s different than ‘adultery’ in that neither person is married so there is no breaking of marriage vows.

‘What is wrong with that?’

Fornication seems natural when the post-Enlighten idea that our bodies are our own meets the Freudian idea that the highest form of self-expression is sexual. The result is the deification of orgasm. 

If you’re a Christian, then your body is not yours to do with as you please. It belongs to God. He has not only created it, but he has bought it back again at the cross. You belong to him. Therefore, when we want to know how to express ourselves sexually, we are to ask what God has designed our bodies for. The Bible does not take the position that sex is the highest way of expressing love to someone. The thrill of intimacy and orgasmic release that comes with sex can have a lot more to do about fulfilling our own longings than actually doing what is best for the other person. Love and intimacy are not synonymous with sexual activity for the Christian as they are for the Freudian.

The Christian view of fornication is that it is dramatic hypocrisy. We are acting out something with our bodies which is untrue of our lives. In sexual intercourse, our bodies are saying to one another ‘I belong to you and you belong to me’. If that is untrue socially, economically and legally then our bodies are telling a lie. Our bodies are ‘one’, but our lives are not. That is why it is written, “Let there be no sexual immorality, impurity, or greed among you. Such sins have no place among God's people.”

If you and the person you are dating have fornicated, there is good news. You can repent and be forgiven. Your past failure in obedience does not need to be a part of your future. Christ died to forgive all sins, including sexual ones.

Repentance needs to be sincere. You need to wisely determine how to avoid sinful behaviour again. Also, it is written ‘Confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed.’ Find a trusted, mature Christian friend who knows how to keep things confidential and ask for prayer. Why? Because, the sense of guilt that many Christians feel after committing sexual sin is usually crippling. God wants his children to celebrate his forgiveness, not walk around with continual shame for past sins.

Lastly, consider getting married soon! If you are both Christians (and you are obviously attracted to one another), why not? Don’t let small obstacles get in your way. Get married, get naked and knock boots all you want, guilt-free.

Don't be afraid. Your Father’s house is always open to you. The bread and wine of forgiveness are on the table. The welcome is free. Only a humble and repentant heart is required.

If you've liked this message, please share or leave a comment on the FB link. 

Also, please check out Forbidden Friendships, which deals with this and related issues. You can get the book off Amazon: Here in the USA  or Here in the UK


Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,

Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of goodwill. But we will return to it again at the end of the letter.
Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been―and are today―countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and marriage. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I affi…

Jezebel: Our Whorable Queen

[Extract from the bookElijah Men Eat Meat]

Ahab married Jezebel, then he proceeded to worship Baal.’ -1Kg 16
Queen Jezebel is a Baal-snogging, fake-teaching, boob-flaunting, pride-marching, man-manipulating, Yahweh-blaspheming, prophets’ blood-drinking monstrosity of a female.
And that’s being nice.
This daughter of Ethbaal, the Phoenician King, grows up surrounded by power, education, luxury, and evil. Of course, she doesn’t think of it as evil. No one sees their culture’s sins for what they are. It is like air to a child or water to a fish: it’s so much a part of us that we don’t even know it is there. She thinks her culture is the rule by which others should be measured. Yes, Israel is used to being surrounded by pagan neighbours and their debauched royalty. But now we have a problem. The problem is that this ghoulish gal now has a throne in the midst of God’s holy nation. It’s one thing for a boat to be in the sea. It’s quite another thing for the sea to be in the boat. And the nati…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …