Skip to main content

The Cross and the Rainbow



The rainbow is a global symbol for LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer) movements. Your Facebook feed has seen many people rainbow-ise their profile pics to celebrate the USA’s 5-4 Supreme Court decision granting couples of the same gender legal status as a married pair.

The rainbow flag - representing the LGBT movement - originated in San Francisco in 1978 and was designed by artist Gilbert Baker. There are two suggested reasons for the choice of the rainbow as a symbol. The first is Dorothy. Remember the Wizard of Oz? Remember Dorothy singing ‘Somewhere over the Rainbow’? Dorothy was played by actress Judy Garland who grew up to be a gay icon. It is thought, by some, that the symbol was a shout-out to her.

The other suggested reason is that the colours reflect the diversity of the LGBTQ movement. Personally, I’ve never thought that reason made much sense (see this post) but it is a reason many LGBTQ people profess. Today the rainbow is globally recognised as a symbol of gay expression. It the chief symbol of a pagan sexuality for an age that is regressing back to its old Western roots of pagan spirituality.

Few people will use those exact words. But the rainbow is - in short - a symbol of Queer Love.

But that is not the only meaning this symbol possesses. Long before the parade in San Francisco, the rainbow was understood to be a unique symbol for how God relates to humanity.

Thanks to Russell Crow, most people have a vague idea of who Noah was - even if they’ve only come across the rather confused Hollywood version of it. Noah was the guy who saved himself and a few others by fearing God’s judgement enough to build an arc (a giant boat that doesn’t actually ‘go’ anywhere - it just floats). He built the arc to escape a global natural disaster in the form of a flood that was God’s punishment on a grossly wicked humanity.

The rainbow first appears after the flood. Genesis chapter nine records God speaking to Noah:
When I bring clouds over the earth and the bow is seen in the clouds,
I will remember my covenant that is between me and you
 and every living creature of all flesh.
And the waters shall never again
become a flood to destroy all flesh.

The bow is the symbol of God’s promise to never again bring down his judgment on all humanity as he did with the big deluge. It’s as if God - after going to battle against all the evil in the world – returns as a victorious warrior and hangs his war-bow up for a rest. The flood did its work - for a time. But evil will come back and good will once again – of moral necessity - have to stand in judgment over it.

But rainbows do not point down at the earth, do they? They point up. They point into the very heart of heaven. And the next time the full judgement of God is fired, that is where it lands: on the Heart of Heaven himself.

And that symbol that target is the cross.

The cross is where God takes his bow out of the clouds, pulls it back to full strength and rains down the arrows of justice on himself. Justice has been served.  But the judge extends love and by punishing himself - not the guilty perpetrators. At the cross, justice and mercy kiss. The rainbow – like the cross – is a symbol for human forgiveness for those who would embrace the new dawn of redeemed spirituality.

Few people will use those exact words. But the rainbow is - in short - a symbol of Christ’s Love.
_______________________________________________
If you've liked this message, please share or leave a comment on the FB link. 

Also, if you would like a FREE chapter from my book, Forbidden Friendships, just email me at MenandWomenFriends@Gmail.com.

Or, you can get the whole book off Amazon: Here in the USA  or Here in the UK

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …