Skip to main content

Rael and his GoTopless Day - Some Sane Thoughts

Yesterday was Go-Topless Day in many cities throughout the USA. Though organisers have tried to make it an international event, it is still mostly Americans who celebrate it big. It involves parades where women march topless and men wear bikini tops or bras. The event was started in 2007 by a funny (and false) prophet named ‘Rael’ who started a UFO religion. I was asked for a Biblical response to the event. So, I have racked my brains trying to bust out some ideas... I have two thoughts.

First of all, try to find them as they may, the moralists won’t find exact modesty codes in the Bible. Nowhere does it say how much make-up a woman should or shouldn’t wear, how long a skirt should be or what is proper bathing attire in mixed company. We do not have strict rules here so let’s not add to God’s word by inventing some and thus bring a curse on ourselves (Rev. 22).

But secondly, the Bible does hold out the idea of modesty as an attitude - but it may not be for the Amish-esque reason you’ve grown up thinking. The popular notion is that Biblical modesty is an idea rooted in the fact that God is somehow anti-sex. The reason is thankfully just the opposite. God created erotic excitement and he wants to bless mankind by not having us completely ruin it.

Let me flesh this out.

A few years back, a psych student proved that what male students thought of as ‘sexy’ changed with the seasons. She would have male students rate various images on a computer screen according to how sexy they thought each was. What she found was that in the winter - when the female students were well covered - it didn’t take much for a male student to find an image ‘sexy’. But in the spring and summer time - when they were surrounded by females who were much less covered – it took considerably more for the man to notice and rate an image as sexy.

This should be common sense. In a culture where women are mostly covered, the sight of a half-naked woman is exciting to a man. In a culture where all women are half-naked, it no longer is.

The Bible says ‘The marriage bed should be kept undestroyed.’ One way to keep the marital bed an exciting place, is to reserve some things for it. If our society went publically topless, the sight of his topless wife would no longer be exciting for the man. There is a reason that both internet pornography and the need for Viagra both exploded around the same time. Regular porn use didn’t make men more potent in bed, it made them less excited and, therefore, more impotent. In sexualising everything, we made sex less sexy.

So, for the love of God and of sex, I do not wish Rael and his topless crew well in their quest to get women to walk around topless all the time. Sure, it would be exciting for a day or two, but the novelty would wear off soon and what has traditionally been kept for the bedroom would no longer be as exciting. While not trying to erase feminine beauty from the public square – aka the Islamic burka - let’s keep a few things a surprise for the marriage bed – surprise does serve to enhance, not detract, from erotica.


Hope you found those thoughts a nice pair.
__________________________________________________

Please share or leave a comment, here or on the FB link.

Or, check out my book Forbidden Friendships on Amazon: in the USA  or the UK 

Also, if you would like a FREE chapter to try it out, just email me at MenandWomenFriends@Gmail.com. 

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …