Skip to main content

Of the Transphobe Bruhaha, Rapists and Supermen


Contrary to much of what we see on social media, the current debate is not about transphobia. Now, I’m sure that there are a handful of people out there who genuinely hate or are afraid of ‘transgender’ people (the correct meaning of the term) - but I have yet to meet any in person. So let us not be those who are ignorant of definitions nor those who simply retreat to the more comfortable country of name calling rather than actually engage in intelligent discussion. Quickly throwing out 'bigot' or 'transphobe' is a hand grenade to real dialogue. 

The current brouhaha was stirred when Australian feminist Germaine Greer made the claim that Bruce Jenner (who underwent surgery in attempts to become a woman and who now goes by the name of ‘Caitlyn’) is *gasp* not actually a woman. For sharing her view - and the view of the majority of us who live on planet earth - this secular feminist has been vilified with some of the most hateful terms and slurs that the LGBT-jihadies can come up with. Though not true of all in the LGBT community - there are many who will not be satisfied until everyone praises their position. (Though this is - in a  sense - true of other groups, they do not have the same organised media power with which to silence their opponents.)

The question centres on the ability of a person to change their identity. To what degree are we what we feel like? Some of you may disagree with Greer. You believe that if a person feels themself to be of one gender, that they ought to be recognised as such or at least have the freedom to undergo a surgery making them so. You hold to the radical notion of the liberty to self-identify. At first glance, there seems to be something noble in that. But let’s ask ourselves some honest questions.

If a man feels like a woman, does that make him woman? Does this only go across the gender divide? Could it go across the species divide? If I sincerely feel that I am a feline born in a human body, should I have the right to be recognised by society as a cat? This may seem comical to you, but an acquaintance made this sincere comment on FB, ‘I think if Greer really wants to identify as a cocker spaniel then she should be allowed to do so, and her doctor should give her all the help that they [sic] can.’

At what point will we cease to grant the right to self-identify? What about race? As I wrote about earlier in the year when white woman Rachel Dolezal claimed to be black - because that’s how she felt - she was vilified by the same media that praised Jenner. (See here) Why can’t Dolezal self-identify across the racial divide and be accepted for it?

Leaving behind gender and race, what about behavioural interpretation? I know rapists in prisons who self-identify as heroes. They sincerely believe they were helping their female victims. Do we allow them the right to self-identify or do we sit them down and help them come tot he knowledge of the truth? 

It used to be that when a man claimed to be superman, we gave him a psychiatrist and tried to help him adjust his thinking to reality. Now, we give him a cape and try to help reality adjust to his thinking. Instead of helping someone out of their confusion, we affirm them in it. We now take the easy way out.

Greer made two rational points that bigotry would keep one from calmly considering. The first, is that Jenner is male scientifically. If you were to clone him, his DNA would reproduce a boy. Secondly, Jenner did not grow up experiencing a menstrual period, the possibility of pregnancy and romantic vulnerability before a world of teenage boys (in the way girls do). Putting on make-up and a dress and shooting oestrogen into your veins simply does not give you this background experience that women worldwide share.

‘Transphobe’ is a loaded term that kills debate. Jenner – and others like – don’t need any fear or hate. God loves Jenner and Greer and you and me alike. Jenner is a hurt and confused guy that has been running from his Y chromosome ever since his youth - he deserves our deepest sympathy and all the help and love we can offer him.

Help that involves things other than chopping his penis off.
_______________________________________________
Joshua D. Jones has written about friendship across the gender divide in the book Forbidden Friendships - available on Amazon in Paperback and Kindle in the USA and the UK

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So Josh invited me to comment on this - what I wrote in response was long and I got confused trying to put it in as separate comments, as you can see from the multiple deleted comments above (I'm not that indecisive, honest)

    So I posted my reply on my own blog, and if you want to read it, you can do that here - http://wordmatt.com/news-and-reviews/

    ReplyDelete
  7. http://wordmatt.com/2015/10/28/response-to-joshua-jones-regarding-germaine-greer/

    ReplyDelete
  8. There seems to be a big push for transgenderism right now in news media and in film/TV - The Danish Girl, Transparent, Tangerine, etc... why do you think this is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good question Wonderer. I'm not sure why. Perhaps it is the next logical social issue to be addressed in the deconstruction of 'traditional' sexuality. Start with divorce or free love. Then move on to homosecxuality, then transgenderism. Next? I don't know? a wider acceptance of bestiality or pedophalia?

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …