Skip to main content

The Death of Sex


Anyone with a pair of eyeballs can see porn. Anyone with another set of balls seems to want to. (Though ‘erotica’ for girls is on the rise). But it shouldn’t be too difficult for most people to see something else: we have killed sex.

Today - Tuesday the 13th - Playboy magazine announced to the lecherous masses that it is planning to drop fully nude female photos from its magazine. (Whether intentional or not, they did this on ‘National No Bra Day’ - a movement started in 2011 to supposedly raise awareness about breast cancer.)

It’s worth pointing out something I hinted at in August about Go Topless Day (here).

(Yes, it seems that every new holiday coming outta USA these days involves boobs or sex with someone other than your hetero-spouse.)

At first, it may seem good that Playboy is dropping full nudes. ‘After all’, some may say, ‘the SUN in the UK recently decided to drop its topless Page 3 Girls. This is surely progress.’

Only it isn’t. People aren’t stopping to look at pictures of naked ladies because they have repented of lust. They aren’t suddenly more moral or more enlightened. The truth is, they are bored. Playboy's CEO Scott Flanders explained about the influence of online porn, ‘You're now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free. It's just passé at this juncture.’

Lust carries within itself the seeds of its own destruction. Sex is a great gift from God to be enjoyed between a man and a woman who are married. But like nuclear power, this gift is destructive when taken out of its safe context.

30 years ago boys would sneak behind the school house to sneak a peak in a porn magazine in hopes seeing a naked woman. Today – in a world where Viagra seems as necessary as water – such images are boring. People will never find an image naked enough to satisfy what it is they're looking for. Only Jesus can meet that longing.

May God save our souls and our sex.
___________________________________________

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Holy Halloween?

The big ugly debate is upon us.
No, not the Presidential one. This debate involves dwarves and banshees of quite another variety.
As heated as the political scene may now be, it will pale to fervor with which Christians will begin debating if and how they will celebrate what is now commonly called "Halloween". This battle of ideas will be waged from the beaches of church pews to the hills of Facebook. There will be shots fired and people unfriended.
But what cyber surfing culture warrior would be complete without some historical trivia and theological sanity? Here you go...

The Background Story
The devil would love to steal All Hallow’s Eve (Halloween) away from Christians. He is making good progress at it too.
All Hallow’s Eve is neither American nor pagan in heritage. The name should be obvious enough. Hallow means ‘holy’ (‘Hallowed be thy name’) and it marks a three-day celebration of the victory of Jesus over the powers of darkness as experienced by departed saints and Christi…