Skip to main content

Should Churches be Silent on Homo-Sex?

'Not to speak, is to speak'

This is a discussion that Christians must have. It’s not over what the Bible says about homosexual practice. Though there’s much internet fluff to the contrary, that subject is not a complex one and is briefly touched on HERE. The discussion we must have is how public we should be about it in church.

There are many solid Christians - who pray, feed the poor, teach the Bible, etc. – who are unsure on how to deal with our society that celebrates sodomy wrapped in rainbow paraphernalia. These Christians also know and love many people who identify as LGBT (Lesbian, Gay Bisexual, and Transgendered). As Christians, we don’t want to offend or anger these nice people.  Because of this, many churches - ones that know homosexual practice is described in the Bible as an evil – keep quiet over the matter. The official stance of the church may be one that reflects the Biblical teaching of sex being for one man and one woman in marriage alone. But they never publically expound on this stance. They address the issue only in private discussions.

Why do some Christians embrace this methodology and is there a better way?

First, some Christians don’t address this openly because they believe it to be too private an issue. But the devil isn’t saving this topic for closed-door counselling sessions. He’s parading it with pride. Biblical leaders from Moses to Paul addressed the issue of homo-sex publicly. Was it not personal or complex back then? What reasons do we have not addressing it that they wouldn’t have also faced? At what date on the calendar between the writing of the New Testament and now did it become inappropriate for God’s people to teach on this? The heralding of LGBT ideology causes deception. Our silent response doesn’t help.

Secondly, some don’t want to address it publically in church because they believe it would bring division to the surface. But if there is division on this issue, then it is because there has been so little clear, Biblical teaching informing their views. Not wanting to address the issue because it could stir trouble is like a doctor deciding not to examine a tumour because it could potentially reveal lots of cancer. This issue is festering below the surface in many of our churches. The longer we avoid publically addressing it, the more it will grow and the more deadly it becomes.

Thirdly, many say that we should not address this publically because it isn’t important. But this views homo-sex like an island, completely cut off from the mainland where the ‘important’ doctrines live. But all Biblical teaching is connected. It is related to God’s idea for family, to the authority of scripture, to how we relate the Old and New Testament, to the ability of Jesus to set people free from sin, to issues of self-control and how we correctly interpret Scripture.

Next, some say that we should not publically address this issue because doing so is unloving. If this is true, should we also stop speaking out against all sin in order to be even more loving? Is it unloving to people who complain to publically teach on what the Bible says about complaining? If sin kills, then it is unloving not to warn.

Some say that by teaching on this publically, some people feel signalled out. But surely the opposite is true. There are many wonderful Christian people who do experience SSA (same-sex attraction) and who wonder if they’re the only ones in the congregation who have such feelings. It is unloving to let this minority think they are alone.

Some say that we shouldn’t publically address it because only a small minority of people have SSA. But the majority for whom it is not a personal issue also need Biblical teaching on this issue that is so widely talked about. The LGBT community may be small in number, but they speak with a loud and influential voice. It is unloving to let this majority remain confused

We’ve heard some say that congregations shouldn’t talk publicly about it because the church already talks about it too much. Really? How many times have you sat through a Sunday church service where the pastor carefully taught through the various passages in the Bible that deal with the issue of homosexuality? For most of us, this has never happened. Why then do we get the impression that churches are obsessed with it? Because when some redneck preacher - who has church/cult of 25 people - denounces homosexuality in an unbalanced way (making it out to be the worst of all possible sins) then the media coverage makes it seem that this is normal.

Lastly, some believe that we shouldn’t publically teach on this issue because it would be insensitive. True, we should rightly want to avoid a culture of bravado where we simply say politically incorrect and potentially offensive things for the kicks of it. But though we don’t seek after a bravado spirit, neither do we submit to a cowardly one. We need to address LGBT ideology compassionately, humbly and sensitively… but we do need to address it.

Paul said, ‘I kept back nothing from you, but preached the whole counsel of God, publicly and from house to house.’(Acts 20.20) Can our churches say this? While the serpent continues to slyly ask ‘Did God really say?’ will we sit back and allow his questioning to sew confusion without a clear and decisive rebuttal?

The younger generation needs to hear clearly from their leaders.

Respectful discussion welcomed.
________________________________

bkFor more, check out our book Forbidden Friendships available on Amazon in Paperback and Kindle in the USA and the UK


Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …