Skip to main content

A Letter to Steve Chalke & A Call to the British Christians

Dear Steve Chalke,

Though this letter is written as a challenge to your more recent actions, I’d like to begin by thanking you for the contributions you have made to the Body of Christ here in the UK and to society at large over the years. You have contributed enormously to the British church’s understanding of social activism through the Oasis Trust that you started after your early years as a Baptist minister which has blessed millions. I also appreciate the work of Stop the Traffick which you founded to fight Human Slavery – an issue we both care deeply about.

But sadly, this letter is not about the heroic things you were known for in the past. Rather, I’m writing about the new direction you’ve taken, particularly in regards to your Open Church Charter in which you call on British churches to support gay 'marriages'. 

I have just returned from a pastors' conference in France where one of the speakers was a man who was formerly active in the gay life style but who is now a celibate pastor - loved and accepted by his friends. We should be encouraged to see that leaders like him are emerging in our midst. These are leaders who – though they suffer with same-sex attraction - deny these temptations and live holy, celibate lives, empowered by the Holy Spirit and the intimacy of close spiritual friendships. They send a clear message to our generation: we need love to survive - not necessarily sex. 

But you have taken a different direction than these men and women. You have presented your charter as a tool for accepting practicing LGBT people into a family, but whose family? The God of the Bible? By affirming people in their sin rather than calling them to repent of their sin, you have demonstrated 21st Century, Western inclusiveness - not Christian hospitality. 

Yes, Jesus calls everyone. And he calls them to repent of their sin - not proudly celebrate it. By all means we should apologise to the LGBT community for times and places where we have insinuated that homo-sex is far worse than heterosexual sins. You rightly call that abuse. But it is equally abusive to embrace the opposite extreme and proclaim that such actions are not sinful at all.

Instead of offering Amazing Grace that redeems people from their sin, you're offering Appalling Grace that leaves people enslaved in it. Without repentance and forgiveness as the base, you offer only a faux inclusion. In trying to be inclusive - as 21st century culture defines it - you exclude them from the one community that really matters: the community of the repentant. ('The sexually immoral and those practicing homosexuality... will not inherit the Kingdom of God.' - 1 Cor. 6)

It was not surprising that your charter never once attempts to quote Scripture. Of course it didn't - you and I both know that every verse that mentions homosexual practice condemns it unequivocally. Rather - in the place of Scripture - you make good use of our current culture's more emotive bits of vocabulary: 'acceptance', 'inclusion' 'openness', etc. Further it shows that you have well sniffed out our generational zeitgeist, not only by the words you use, but by the words you don’t use: 'chastity', 'holiness', 'self-control', etc

Even now, let me offer you the loving call which - in your deception - you refuse to give to those who need it most. I call you to repent of your error - lest you find yourself outside the Kingdom. The younger you – the one who once publically wrote to Roy Clements as I am now writing to you - would label as 'false teaching' what you currently promote. 

Your younger you would be right.

Turn back - and the sinful teaching of your later years will be washed and forgiven. Come back home. Those who are now cheering you on as a hero will one be seen as kissing enemies before the Judgement Seat.

To British pastors, leaders and Christians I issue an alternative call to that of Steve's gender-bender charter and its faux inclusion. Don't hide from this issue! Jesus condemns those who even tolerate teaching that makes room for sexual immorality (Rev. 2.20). Yet, many of you have been showing all the stalwartness of a kitten chasing a laser pointer when it comes to sexual sin in general and to homosexual sin in particular. Stop imaging that 'niceness' has become the 10th fruit of the Spirit. Exchange your backbones of wet tissue for ones of bronze, pick up the sword of the Spirit and obediently 'fight the good fight of faith'.

Let us offer a truly loving call to the LGBT community: Come and join the family of the redeemed - join us as we repent of our fornication, adultery, pornography, slander, rage and greed. As the Father forgives and cleanses our sins, he can forgive and clean yours.

He'll leave a light on for you.



  1. Just come across your blog on across your blog as a link on Premier. Thanks. Be encouraged. I also read your Brexit blogg. It's very sad (and worrying) that there has been such vitriol from both sides.

  2. Homosexuality and the Catholic Church

  3. Amen. Well written. Steve Chalke needs to read Matthew 7:15-23. I am afraid Jesus was thinking of him when he said they come as ravaging wolves in sheeps clothing. We are called to beware of them.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,

Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of goodwill. But we will return to it again at the end of the letter.
Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been―and are today―countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and marriage. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I affi…

Jezebel: Our Whorable Queen

[Extract from the bookElijah Men Eat Meat]

Ahab married Jezebel, then he proceeded to worship Baal.’ -1Kg 16
Queen Jezebel is a Baal-snogging, fake-teaching, boob-flaunting, pride-marching, man-manipulating, Yahweh-blaspheming, prophets’ blood-drinking monstrosity of a female.
And that’s being nice.
This daughter of Ethbaal, the Phoenician King, grows up surrounded by power, education, luxury, and evil. Of course, she doesn’t think of it as evil. No one sees their culture’s sins for what they are. It is like air to a child or water to a fish: it’s so much a part of us that we don’t even know it is there. She thinks her culture is the rule by which others should be measured. Yes, Israel is used to being surrounded by pagan neighbours and their debauched royalty. But now we have a problem. The problem is that this ghoulish gal now has a throne in the midst of God’s holy nation. It’s one thing for a boat to be in the sea. It’s quite another thing for the sea to be in the boat. And the nati…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …