Skip to main content

On the Brexit Baloney


Hey Joshua,
As we get ready for the big referendum, how do you think Jesus would vote on Brexit.
-M


Hey dude,

Good question.

When Jesus walked the earth, he was surrounded by a political brouhaha even more charged than our own. There was tension between those who wanted a ‘Israel for the Israelis’ (the Zealots and Pharisees) and those who preferred strong ties to the Roman Empire (the Herodians and Sadducees). Throughout his ministry Jesus was often asked political questions so that people could pin him on a particular ‘side’ in order to discredit him.

But Jesus don’t play that.

He never fell into their trap and was resolute that he was building his own kingdom – one that was ‘not of this world’ (John 18.36). Even in the OT when Joshua – the commander of the Israeli army – asked the pre-incarnate Jesus if he was on their side or the side of their enemies he responded, ‘No; but I am the commander of the army of the Lord. Now I have come.’ (Joshua 5.14).

‘So Jesus, should we stay in the EU or get out?’

‘No. I am here.’

‘Huh?’

The UK and the EU are short lived political experiments. Like Rome, both will fall. But the true government will rest on His shoulders and of His Kingdom there shall be no end. Let’s make our priority to get ourselves and others into that one.

'No.'
As far as the current debate goes, I have concerns on both sides. First of all – for those who think the UK should vote to leave – please be aware of the unhealthy effects of nostlgic nationalism. I am hearing Brits use terms like ‘national sovereignty’ - only they stretch the word out when they pronounce it as if angels should hush in reverence. On the other side of the Atlantic I am hearing similar patriotic catch phrases as the Trumpkins chant ‘Make America Great Again!’ Patriotism has little spiritual benefit.

But secondly, I am also concerned for the pro-EU crowd. There is a nauseating dosage of naiveté being passed around on social media. Many seem to think that if only we can stay in the EU than peace and prosperity will continue to be ours. That’s a foolish amount of confidence to put in any human institution. We may end up staying in the EU but still end up fighting or broke.

This world is not our home. Vote in such a way as you think others will best benefit. ‘Are Europeans better off with the UK in the EU?' That would be a question I would ask myself – if I were to vote.
-J
_____________________

bk
'Can Christian Men & Women be Close Friends?'

Comments

  1. No. Firstly is it right to second guess Jesus' views on the EU? Secondly if we are to follow the above logic, then it is better to ask what will be best for the WORLD, not just Europe. It is also fair to consider "little European" attitudes and EU policies which are impoverishing many nations in and out of Europe, from Spain to Ghana. However I do think that Jesus was not a huge fan of the Roman Empire and so it is not unreasonable to consider that He would choose freedom and democracy over corruption and bullying. I have no doubt whatsoever that Europe will change for the better when we lead the way to cooperation and new horizons and away from the current attitude of control and troubles. I am certain it will benefit the world too. We need to break barriers and gangs and be more international. The entire world is my family and Britain is my closest relatives. The EU is morally corrupt. I have been studying this for over 25 years. God bless those who avoid prejudice and who can be open enough to admit to themselves when things are not as we have been led to think.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Jezebel: Our Whorable Queen

[Extract from the bookElijah Men Eat Meat]

Ahab married Jezebel, then he proceeded to worship Baal.’ -1Kg 16
Queen Jezebel is a Baal-snogging, fake-teaching, boob-flaunting, pride-marching, man-manipulating, Yahweh-blaspheming, prophets’ blood-drinking monstrosity of a female.
And that’s being nice.
This daughter of Ethbaal, the Phoenician King, grows up surrounded by power, education, luxury, and evil. Of course, she doesn’t think of it as evil. No one sees their culture’s sins for what they are. It is like air to a child or water to a fish: it’s so much a part of us that we don’t even know it is there. She thinks her culture is the rule by which others should be measured. Yes, Israel is used to being surrounded by pagan neighbours and their debauched royalty. But now we have a problem. The problem is that this ghoulish gal now has a throne in the midst of God’s holy nation. It’s one thing for a boat to be in the sea. It’s quite another thing for the sea to be in the boat. And the nati…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …