Skip to main content

The Topless Prophet (part one)

Stop! Keep your head on!

So John's friends plead when he speaks against the sexual sin of those in power. Matthew 14 records his words and their consequences: 

‘It’s contrary to God’s law for you to marry your brother’s wife!’

His rebuke rings out over the hot, desert sands of time, upsetting the ease of everyone who has become laid back and tolerant over such matters.

Was John Right?

We might start by asking if John should be a bit nicer. After all, it’s being said that when the queen heard John’s 'cruel' words, she went back into her castle to cry, indulge in chocolate ice cream, and garner social media sympathy points. (Which was good because her tweets hadn’t been getting nearly as many likes as they used to.)

But a much wiser question would be: Can we be confident that John was right in giving that rebuke?

John’s rebuke against the sexual sin of Herod is based on a law in the much-maligned book of Leviticus. It's stated in chapter 18 and then repeated slightly differently in chapter 20. And though Scripture directs us to usually give rebukes in private, Herod was a public figure who was sinning publicly and unapologetically – therefore a public rebuke was appropriate. It’s the same for leaders today. (1 Tim 5.20)

Is the Bible Understandable?

Have you ever worked with children? One of the things that mine do, when I ask them about something they’re uncomfortable with, is to pretend they don’t understand what I’m saying.

Me: Naomi, did you clean your room like I asked you to?
Naomi: Room? Which room? Our house has lots of rooms?

Or,

Me: Ransom, did you hit your little brother?
Ransom: Brother?
Me: Yes, your little brother Elijah.
Ransom: What do you mean by ‘hit’?

We are big children and we do this with the words of our Heavenly Father when he says something we aren’t comfortable with. Here in the 21st Century Anglo-Saxon world, we’ve become masters of this art. If John lived in our day and issued his rebuke, the crowd around him would give him feedback along these lines:

John: It is not lawful for you to marry or sleep with your brother’s wife!
Us: John, are you sure that’s relevant? There are far worse sins happening.
Us: Moses is no longer the ruler of Israel John, we’re in Greco-Roman times now. We know things the ancients didn’t.
Us: Don’t judge John. Focus on your own sin.
Us: But John, that rule is taken from Leviticus – and that book has some weird stuff in it.
Us: John, you should stick with your message about sharing our clothing with the poor. That bit went down well in the media.
Us: Moses was speaking only in the context of pagan worship. 
Us: But God is love, and if Herod and Herodias really love each other, why do you want to keep them apart?
Us: Moses wrote that in Hebrew 1,500 years ago. We speak Aramaic. You need to understand the word for ‘brother’ meant something different in the original dialect.

Clarity

When the serpent got Eve to sin, he first fed into the idea that God’s Word was unclear and confusing. ‘Did God really say…?’ he whispered.

By contrast, the people of God looked back on Scripture and said things like:

‘The unfolding of your words give light; it gives understanding to the simple.’ -Ps 119
and
‘From childhood, you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. All Scripture is God-breathed and useful.’ -2 Tim. 3

It’s blasphemy to excuse our laziness in the careful study of Scripture by blaming God for not being clear enough.

Bible Degrees

John was arrested and then made topless in the worst possible way. All he had done was convey what Scripture had always said, but a new generation had ignored. John was faithful - he cared little for being clever. He didn't have a degree from an outstanding University. He was schooled by God in the desert. 

My degree is in Theology and my MA in Biblical Interpretation. You know what that means?

Not much.

When I was 17 I could understand 90% of the passages I do now with the basic help of a Bible dictionary or historical/cultural commentary. These are things any literate Christian can obtain and use. And those aren't even necessary for most passages. All the formal education has helped me do is to better explain why some of the new, creative, and contortionist interpretations – the ones that get the passage to say something other than what they obviously mean – are in error.

Like whisky, the truth is best presented spirited and straight - even when done gently. It’s deception that usually gets confusing and needs lots of commentaries. 
_____________________
(Please Share)

bkIf you want to read about spiritual, non-sexual, Male-Female friendship then please check out Forbidden Friendships - available on Amazon in Paperback and Kindle in the USA and the UK.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …