Skip to main content

Book Review: The Strange Death of Europe

4/5 Stars. In many ways, this is an excellent book. If you want a book that gives a review of the social and political causes and impacts of recent immigration into Europe, this is the one. And I say that as an immigrant myself.

Regardless of your political stance or what you’d like to believe about immigration into Europe, it will be hard to argue with Murray’s research. The facts don’t care about our feelings and this book is filled with facts – many of which our feelings might not care for. His thesis is that Europe is committing suicide and one of its primary tools is through the unstrategic and (seemingly) unlimited immigration that has occurred in recent decades and – more importantly – in the last three years.

Those who may not like the facts that he presents may be tempted to paint him as a xenophobe or racist. He isn’t. He often shows how these policies aren’t particularly helping immigrants either and how genuine refugees who need our help the most, often aren’t getting it.

I found it interesting to read – not only as an immigrant – but also as a Christian. Murray himself is agnostic and his inevitable nihilism is felt throughout the book. To his credit, he's a lot more honest about it than most agnostics /atheists are.

He recognises that Europe could possibly receive millions of immigrants if its culture was strong. But Murray shows in many ways that it is not. He bemoans European shallowness, the fact that the European identity is currently so ill-defined, and our art is so hollow to what it once was. In the face of millions of Islamic immigrants who believe things strongly enough that they are willing to die for them – and a handful to kill for them – what can we call them to? What cultural richness can we assimilate them into that will cause them to want to truly become European?

Through the book, he describes how in the last century we have developed a culture of self-doubt and guilt – to the point of being ashamed we are European. He goes through the various signs of what makes a healthy and unhealthy culture – and we are unhealthy and unable to assimilate millions of immigrants well. In the end, Murray’s book is pessimistic. He gives no clear solution to our cultural (dare I say ‘spiritual’) malaise. He seems to think that in 100 years Europe will be Islamic. Much sooner in Sweden and Germany.

As Christians, we would probably agree that if Europe does not rediscover the gospel, then Murray is probably right. Nationalist parties will grow in popularity and the effects of unrestricted immigration become more visible. But it will be too late. Murray mentions Christianity, but he presupposes that it is no longer a viable option for thinking people. He assumes that textual criticism has dismissed the possibility of real confidence in the Hebrew/Christian scriptures. As a pastor who did his post-grad work in the hermeneutics of those Scriptures, I wish he would take a closer look.

As it stands, Europe’s future is dark. But if we see a movement of spiritual awakening to the gospel – one that sees millions of secular Europeans and Muslim immigrants repenting and turning to Christ – then that will result in quite a different story


For those of you who are Christians, if there was ever an hour in European history to fast, pray, and be bold with the gospel, that hour is here. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,
Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of good will - but will return to it again at the end of the letter. Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been – and are today – countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and sexuality. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I …

Where I Turn Down a Gay 'Wedding' Invitation

Dear Katie,
I hope this letter finds you well. You’ve been on my mind lately as it’s been a few weeks since we’ve met up. We’re overdue to grab a coffee – I hope we can soon. I also want to thank you for thinking of me as you sent out invitations for what I know will be a big day for you and Joanna. I’ve known you since before you met her (two years ago now, is it?) and I appreciate all you’ve shared with me about how meaningful that relationship is to you. It was especially kind of you given my Christian faith. You've never directly asked me my views on gender or sex in much detail. But I think our conversations must have touched on it enough times to at least make you a bit unsure of my reaction when you sent the invitation. I have to say 'no' to your kind invitation. You know that I care for you and that I value our friendship. You know I don't reject you because you are gay. So, would it be too much to ask of you if I explain why my faith would make attendance at your…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …