Skip to main content

Theological Fascism in a Skirt

I have had the privilege of knowing more than one woman who carries the title of ‘pastor’. Many of them are perfectly lovely ladies with whom I merely disagree about church structure. Most of them carry the title together with their husband and work as a ‘pastoral couple’ (think Brian and Bobbie Houston of Hillsong). I don’t hold to that view, but still, these women seem to love the Lord and the lost and I don’t spend my time arguing with such ‘Egalitarians’.
But the Egalitarian movement is being hijacked by intoleristas. These are the men and women who not only will fight for women’s ordination but who will fight against you for disagreeing. They are the Feminist Gestapo and sadly they are gaining ground. This is perhaps best illustrated by a horrendous piece (Here) published online by Faith & Leadership from Duke University of all places. Their missional subtext is A learning resource for Christian leaders and their institutions. I don’t know what leaders or institutions would find this article particularly educational. It probably helps explain why Duke ministers often end up serving in dying liberal denominations.
The article is written by Rev. Melissa Florer-Bixler and though we shouldn’t always judge based on the double barrel name, in this case, the stereotype is painfully accurate. The hyper-womansplaining title of the article alone lets you know where this is going: 10 Commandments for Male Clergy.
Before we go any further, just think about that. Do you think that Duke would ever publish an article by a man called: 10 Commandments for Female Clergy? You know they wouldn’t. That’s because Duke and the wider progressive movement in the Anglo-Saxon world have bought into the myth that it’s impossible to discriminate against men but that all women in the Western world are constantly subjected to oppressive everyday sexism. By embracing this narrative, outrageously rude articles like Melissa's can be published by what is supposed to be a reputable institution. Let’s look at some of these commandments that Melissa says men should obey.

Decline to purchase books written by men who exclude women from the pulpit.

That’s right: Burn your books. Don’t consider alternate points of view. The new fascism is here and it’s wearing a skirt (but we shouldn’t talk about that either - it’s one of the rules). The idea that we should only read theological books by Feminist authors is actually being published by Duke University. Shame. That’s 98% of church leaders through 98% of church history disqualified. No more buying Augustine, Chrysostom, Luther, Piper, David Pawson, Jonathan Edwards, Ignatius Loyola, etc. You can only buy books by Feminists – you are not allowed to think outside the box we give you. The next rule?

Thou shalt not doubt me when I say something is sexist.

That’s right. Not only are we not allowed to read what we want, we’re not allowed to doubt a woman in any discussion about sexism. She speaks, you listen. Mansplaining is a crime but femsplaining is perfectly legitimate.  Something is sexist if I say it is. Can this work both ways? How would a woman feel if a man commanded her ‘Don’t doubt me when I say…’. A line like this would never be allowed in print if it were going in the other direction. This is because theological Feminism doesn’t care about equality. They want to talk down to men – something this article demonstrates brilliantly. And if you doubt that, consider the next commandment:

Thou shalt believe women when they say things.

I didn’t make that up. It’s really there. Not only can we not read or doubt, now we can’t even think for ourselves. If a woman says something, it must be believed! Should I also believe all the godly, Biblical women who would say this article is lunacy? Or do you mean only Feminist women?
Once again, can you imagine a male clergyman writing this to women? Ladies, always believe it when a man tells you something. There would be a progressive outcry. Starbucks would be trashed. People would march wearing those ridiculous vagina hats on their heads. But because it’s a woman writing it to men, Duke University prints it as being perfectly acceptable. Then there is this commandment:

Thou shalt not joke about my having “lost a lot of weight” since you last saw me -- even if I’ve had a baby.

On one level, this is reasonable and good. If you were raised in a home where you were taught good manners, you were instructed never to joke about a woman’s weight. Good. But read the context of the article. Our dear Melissa is writing an article about how women clergy should be treated more like male clergy. Do you think we male clergy ever joke about each other’s weight? Every damn time we get together. I can’t think of a time we ministers haven’t met at a restaurant or buffet and haven’t made fun of one of our brethren and his need for ‘more fasting’. This is how men treat other men. I don’t think a man should joke about a woman’s weight – but I’m not a Feminist so I’m not the one arguing that men and women should be treated the same.
And this is the dilemma for Feminism. We want to be treated the same as men… but we don’t. Treat us just like men… but only in the areas we tell you to. In some ways, our Melissa is admitting a weakness – or at least a difference. It’s ok for male clergy to joke and banter each other – but we ladies of the cloth are too fragile to take it.

What is the way forward? For one, men must do better.

That’s right: it's men. Ministry is hard and we need someone to blame. Men are fair game. Let’s call it ‘the Patriarchy’. It’s their fault I don't feel successful. 
Duke, it’s you that ‘must do better’. You’ve embarrassed yourself.

Please Share

bkHow can Christian Men and Women have meaningful friendships without scandal? Please check out  Forbidden Friendships 


  1. Or, this:


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend

[Response to the letter Dear Non-Affirming Christian]
Dear Pro-Gay Christian Friend,

Thank you for taking the time to write me. Sadly, it seems you misunderstand why I met with you for coffee. Please let me explain my motives by defining the words in my salutation above. Would this be too terrible a way to go about it?
Let’s start with ‘friend’ shall we? You rightly question this term as an accurate description of our relationship. For now, let's simply say I mean it as an expression of goodwill. But we will return to it again at the end of the letter.
Then there's this term, 'pro-gay'. By this, I don't mean your personal sexual urges. There have historically been―and are today―countless godly leaders in the church who have deep sexual and romantic attractions to people of the same gender. In spite of their desires, they remain celibate and teach orthodox views of gender and marriage. In your letter, you repeatedly refer to me as a ‘non-affirming Christian’, but I affi…

Jezebel: Our Whorable Queen

[Extract from the bookElijah Men Eat Meat]

Ahab married Jezebel, then he proceeded to worship Baal.’ -1Kg 16
Queen Jezebel is a Baal-snogging, fake-teaching, boob-flaunting, pride-marching, man-manipulating, Yahweh-blaspheming, prophets’ blood-drinking monstrosity of a female.
And that’s being nice.
This daughter of Ethbaal, the Phoenician King, grows up surrounded by power, education, luxury, and evil. Of course, she doesn’t think of it as evil. No one sees their culture’s sins for what they are. It is like air to a child or water to a fish: it’s so much a part of us that we don’t even know it is there. She thinks her culture is the rule by which others should be measured. Yes, Israel is used to being surrounded by pagan neighbours and their debauched royalty. But now we have a problem. The problem is that this ghoulish gal now has a throne in the midst of God’s holy nation. It’s one thing for a boat to be in the sea. It’s quite another thing for the sea to be in the boat. And the nati…

Driscoll Returns, ‘Christian Today’ Melts.

Sometimes in the course of events, a peculiar thing happens that then triggers a response more peculiar still. This is what we now see with the return of Pastor Mark Driscoll to the church scene.
For those unfamiliar with the drama, Mark Driscoll was a church planter and Bible teacher who made a big impact in the least churched city in the USA: Seattle. Thousands professed faith in Christ through his ministry. But he left the church that he had started under dark circumstances. No, it wasn’t adultery as is so often the case with some of these big-name preachers. Rather, it was heavy-handed leadership―resulting in many spiritually crushed church members―that drove him to resign.
Now, three years later, he is leading a new church and many are downloading his sermons once again. This is not without some valid controversy―for reasons we’ll mention soon. But what is most noticeable is not his peculiar return. It is the reaction among those who lean left of classical Christian teaching: the …